अथ चैनं नित्यजातं नित्यं वा मन्यसे मृतम्।

तथापि त्वं महाबाहो नैवं शोचितुमर्हसि।।2.26।।

Atha chainam nityajatam nityam va manyase mrtam,

Tathapi tvam mahabaho naivam socitum arhasi.

Meaning

If you think the soul is born constantly and dies constantly, Even then, O mighty-armed one, you should not grieve.

Context

In this part of the Bhagavad Gita, Arjuna is confused and sad about fighting in the Kurukshetra war. He is worried about killing his relatives and teachers on the battlefield. Krishna speaks to Arjuna to clear his confusion.

Krishna explains that the soul is eternal and cannot be destroyed. In this verse (2.26), Krishna tells Arjuna that even if he believes the soul is constantly born and dies, there is still no reason to feel sorrow. Death is natural and unavoidable. Hence, Arjuna should not be overwhelmed by grief. Krishna is encouraging Arjuna to fight and fulfill his duty as a warrior.

Explanation

In the previous verses (especially 2.20), Krishna explains that the soul is never born and never dies. It is eternal, unchanging, and indestructible. The soul (ātman) is beyond birth, death, and decay. This is the core teaching about the eternal nature of the soul.

In verse 2.26, Krishna is addressing an alternative view Arjuna might hold: that the soul undergoes constant birth and death. Even under this belief (which is different from the actual teaching), Krishna says there is still no reason to grieve because death is a natural process, just like birth.

The difference is:

Previous verses: The soul is eternal, never born, and never dies (absolute truth).
Verse 2.26: Even if you think the soul takes birth and dies repeatedly (relative belief), there is no reason for sorrow.

Krishna proposes this view in verse 2.26 to address Arjuna's doubts from multiple perspectives. Arjuna is confused and hesitant to fight because he fears the death of his loved ones. Krishna uses different arguments to ease Arjuna's grief and help him understand the nature of life and death.

By presenting the alternative view - that the soul experiences constant birth and death - Krishna is trying to cover all possibilities, even those that Arjuna might believe in or understand. Krishna is essentially saying: "Even if you do not fully accept the eternal nature of the soul, and instead believe in the soul's constant rebirth and death, there is still no reason to grieve."

Krishna uses this strategy to:

Appeal to Arjuna's emotions: He acknowledges that Arjuna may not immediately grasp or accept the deeper spiritual concept of the soul's eternity.
Remove Arjuna's sorrow from all angles: Whether Arjuna believes in the eternal soul or in the repeated birth and death of the soul, Krishna wants to show him that there is no logical reason for grief.
Encourage action: Krishna uses this view to guide Arjuna back to his duty as a warrior (Kshatriya).

In today’s context

Let's take an example of a romantic relationship that ends. Suppose two people, Rohan and Meera, were in a committed relationship for several years. Over time, they grew apart due to personal differences, and after many attempts to reconcile, they decided to part ways. Naturally, both felt a deep sense of loss and sadness.

In this painful situation, the teaching from Bhagavad Gita 2.26 can help. The shloka reminds us that attachment and separation are part of life’s natural cycles. Just as life involves birth and death, relationships also have a beginning and an end. Grieving excessively over the end of a relationship only causes suffering and prevents healing.

For Rohan and Meera, Krishna’s message would encourage them to understand that their bond, while valuable, has run its course. Just as nothing in life is permanent — people, jobs, possessions — relationships too are subject to change. Holding onto grief or regret would prevent them from moving forward in life.

By applying the lesson from the shloka, Rohan and Meera can come to terms with the fact that attachment (like in relationships) is not eternal. They can focus on the good memories and lessons learned, while accepting the need to let go and grow individually. This realization brings peace, allowing them to heal and open themselves to new experiences and relationships in the future.

The key message is: holding on to what is meant to end only prolongs pain. Letting go with acceptance brings inner peace and helps us face life's changes with strength and wisdom.

Highlights of traditional commentaries

Sri Abhinavagupta

Focuses on the soul’s eternal nature, explaining that nothing, including weapons, can harm the soul, as it is free from divisions or dependencies.
Emphasizes that even if one believes in the soul’s constant rebirth and association with new bodies, the soul itself remains unchanged.
Asserts that one should not grieve knowing the soul’s unchanging essence, unaffected by the birth or destruction of the body, which is impermanent.

Sri Jayatritha

Argues that the soul's eternal nature has already been established, and Krishna is now addressing Arjuna's doubts from another angle.
Suggests that even if one accepts the soul undergoes repeated births and deaths, Arjuna should not mourn, as death and birth are inevitable in life.
Critiques alternate philosophical views, such as that of the Māyāvādins, rejecting them by aligning with the concept of the eternal soul.

Sri Madhusudana Saraswati

Discusses various philosophical perspectives on the soul, including Buddhist views, materialist views, and other schools of thought that believe the soul is momentary or perishes with the body.
Even if one holds to these views, Krishna urges Arjuna not to grieve, as the cycle of birth and death is inevitable in those doctrines too.
Uses this discussion to refute non-dualistic and nihilistic viewpoints, affirming the immortality of the soul.

Sri Purushottamji

Highlights that even from a worldly or materialistic perspective, Arjuna should not grieve, because the belief in the soul being constantly born or dying is linked to the body.
Suggests that Arjuna, as a mighty warrior, should not be troubled by this body-based belief since the soul remains unaffected.

Sri Shankaracharya

Uses "Atha ca" to introduce an alternate viewpoint, where the soul is believed to be born and die repeatedly with each body.
Emphasizes that even with such a belief, Arjuna should not grieve because birth and death are natural and unavoidable phenomena in life.
The commentary affirms that Krishna’s advice holds regardless of whether one believes in the soul’s eternity or its cycle of rebirth.

Sri Vallabhacharya

Takes the view that even if one holds to a materialistic philosophy, believing the soul to be ever-born or constantly dying, there is still no reason for sorrow.
The commentary stresses that grief is inappropriate, whether one believes in the soul’s eternity or in a more transient understanding of its existence.

Sri Anandgiri

Comments that the idea of the soul being constantly reborn or dying cannot coexist with the belief in its eternity.
Suggests that Krishna, in compassion, addresses Arjuna’s possible misunderstanding by explaining that even if Arjuna follows a non-ideal view of the soul, there is no need for grief.
Highlights that sorrow is unreasonable, whether one believes in the soul’s permanence or its temporal existence.

Sri Dhanpati

Argues that even accepting other philosophical views, like those of materialists or atheists, the soul's constant rebirth or death does not justify mourning.
States that even worldly perspectives deny the necessity for grief, focusing on the impermanence of the body rather than the soul.

Sri Madhavacharya

Similar to other commentators, suggests that even in the context of a belief in the soul's constant rebirth and death, Arjuna should not grieve.
Adds that the inevitability of birth and death means that grief over the physical body is unnecessary.

Sri Neelkantha

Explores different philosophical views, such as those of materialists and Buddhists, who may hold the soul to be constantly born or momentary.
States that from any of these perspectives, there is still no reason for grief, and Krishna encourages Arjuna to rise above these transient beliefs.

Sri Ramanuja

Focuses on the impermanence of the body rather than the soul, asserting that birth and death are natural processes.
Even if one believes the body and soul are one, there is no need for grief since the body's transformation is inevitable.

Sri Sridhara Swami

Suggests that even from the viewpoint that the soul is constantly associated with birth and death, there is no need to grieve.
Emphasizes that the soul is unaffected by the body’s experiences of birth and death, making grief unnecessary.

Sri Vedantadeshikacharya Venkatanatha

Argues that even in a materialistic worldview, where the soul is believed to experience birth and death, grief is not justified.
Krishna’s teaching holds true regardless of the philosophical standpoint, and the focus remains on the futility of grieving over something as inevitable as birth and death.

91.9K

13.8K